Publications

Photo Source: The Express Tribune

We need to “democratize” the water debate and take charge. Our region seems to have abdicated the water debate to war mongers. This in turn has affected our focus on impending water problems. Worse, is the political abdication of the issue to bureaucracies and courts.

Conflict Reader # 19, 8 April 2017

Water
Scarcity, Institutions, Securitization: Our “Other” Water Issues

CR Comment

D. Suba Chandran
Professor
International Strategic and Security Studies Programme (ISSSP)
National Institute of Advanced Studies (NIAS), Bangalore

During the recent weeks, there have been numerous commentaries and talk shows on sharing of the Indus waters. So much space and time was spent in social, print and electronic media to discuss the Indo-Pak water “conflicts” and their fallouts. While issues relating to sharing the Indus and tributaries are undoubtedly important, let our obsessive focus on the Indus Waters Treaty not undermine some of the equally important water issues and problems facing South Asia.

Sharing of waters at the international level between Afghanistan and Pakistan, India and Pakistan, Nepal and India, Bangladesh and India, and China and India have subsumed some of the other important issues that the region will be facing in the near future. Perhaps, we are already facing it now in some areas. We need to invest more time, funds, efforts and capacities in understanding water from a multi-disciplinary perspective, than focussing narrowly on “sharing the rivers” and “securitizing” it in terms of focussing on “Water Wars” debate.

One of the most important issues that South Asia is likely to face in the next few years is water scarcity. Barring perhaps Nepal and Bhutan, there are enough indicators backed by statistics at the national and international levels about the impending disaster. We don’t need PhDs and rocket science to understand the basic issue – substantial increase in population. South Asia, despite criticism has relatively better health facilities leading to declining death rates, and expanding life expectancy. This would mean that the nature has to provide water more human beings in South Asia (approximately 1650 million), than it has ever been in the history. When the livestock are added to the above, then one could understand the South Asian explosion. Any reasonable, even conservative estimate for the next twenty years would reveal the extent of the problem. 

An added point to the above debate, in the recent years is the emphasis on “quality” of the water, and not just its availability. If the focus on access to “clean water” has to be taken into account, then the above calculations will become even more alarming in terms of availability.

Second important water issue that goes unnoticed in the larger “water wars” debate is the rapid urbanization process in South Asia. Again in historical terms, never before our population lived in cities as much as we do now. On the one hand towns are metamorphosing into cities; on the other, there is a deliberate strategy to build satellites cities around the main centers. And take a look at our cities and their population: Delhi and Karachi have a population of 23 plus millions each, almost the total population of Australia. Population of the entire Scandinavian countries put together is only around 26 million. Mumbai, Kolkata and Dhaka have approximately a population of 15 million plus each; almost the twice the population of Austria. Lahore, Chennai and Bangalore have a population of around 10 million each - roughly the population of Sweden. Eight cities of South Asia alone will account for 120 million plus population, which is more than the total population of Germany (80 mn) and Turkey (78 mn) and almost the double of France (66 mn) and UK (65 mn).

We are happy and even proud of rapid urbanization in South Asia; but, from a water perspective – we have to be worried about from two counts. Where we will find the water that would support the cities? This is not only about feeding the population, but also finding adequate water to service the entire urbanization process – from construction to cleaning. Second, where will this water come from and at what cost? Water for cities like Bangalore and Chennai come from far, straining the already existing water agreements over rivers. 

Our cities are likely to appropriate more water, at the cost of spending the same on our agriculture. Since the politics and politicking take place mainly in the cities, the farmers and their requirements are either likely to get silenced, or politicized in the process. Added to the above appropriation is the presence of media in the cities – social, print and electronic – totally diverting the water debate into a different direction. 

Third problem over water would stem from the above – “securitization” of water debate, by those actors who are sitting in their air conditioned offices, abusing water (from their daily shaves to car wash) but talking about water wars. These are scaremongers, who don’t have to walk even a meter to get water (when compared to those who walk miles searching for water whether in Balochistan or in Rajasthan), or wait in a queue to fill a pot, but have the money to buy – either the bottled water for drinking, or tanker water for daily use. The upper class salons and spa centers will even advice to rinse the scalp with mineral water to avoid hair fall. Compare it with the stories of “water wives” in Maharashtra in India, where men marry more than one woman, primarily to ensure adequate water for daily use; the primary objective of these water wives is to fetch water. If the local society silently accepts and relegates our best halves just to fetch water, there is a serious sociological problem. 

We need to “democratize” the water debate and take charge. Our region seems to have abdicated the water debate to war mongers. This in turn has affected our focus on impending water problems. Worse, is the political abdication of the issue to bureaucracies and courts. Political leaders and community leaders are better suited to discuss the problems of water; instead, we have entrusted this crucial issue to our bureaucracies filled with engineers. So is our idea of taking the issue to courts, expecting our lawyers and judges would understand and deliver justice. Unfortunately, despite their efforts and experience, these are people who could talk in terms of numbers – height of the dams and amount of water to be released. Sharing of water is humanitarian issue that cannot be quantified and talked in terms of cusecs and cubic meters. Community and political leaders will have to take charge and understand that it is matter of life and death, and not just adhering to treaties and numbers. 

Fourth issue is related to our institutions of water governance – for example - IRSA, WAPDA and numerous Water Tribunals of India. Are they our best way forward to understand and appreciate the water problems? Or, should we take a basin approach for each of our rivers, and bring the community in? There could be a twin approach with the above two segments, complementing each other in their work. The “spirit” of cooperation in addressing water problems through the second approach will work well, especially when the “letter” approach of the former get caught in politics and problems of governance leading to an inexplicable delay.

Fifth, we will have to look into water availability, scarcity and its quality both for human and wildlife, and the need to sustain their growth. A region that believes in “Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam” – that the world is one family, cannot look at water needs from the perspectives of only the human beings; it should include people, wild life and plant life as well.

Finally, our investment in water studies both at the national and regional levels need to be augmented. From Amazon to Jordan to Mekong, there is so much we could learn in terms of effective use of existing water. We need to invest in alternative measures – from dry land farming to drip irrigation and make better use of our crop patterns. All the above need investment, sustained research and cross-pollination across the region. Equally important is also to understand issues of climate change; they have to be studied, predicted and forecasted in terms of what they would mean from a water perspective. 

We need more institutions, people and reports from a multi-disciplinary perspective, supported by a regional dialogue cutting across national boundaries. And this focus cannot be only on human beings; it has to include our wildlife and flora as well. There is so much we need to study, learn and forecast about water. Let the “water war” debate not derail what our primary focus should be.
 
The above comment was published originally in the Daily Times. 

Other Publications

Early Warning Conflict Alert
January 2019 | Brief

South Asia: Five Conflicts to Watch in 2019

read more
Sri Lanka
November 2018 | Brief

Reconvene the Parliament and Respect the Constitution

read more
Myanmar
October 2018 | Analysis

The UN, Myanmar and the Rohingyas

read more
Kashmir
September 2018 | Analysis

Building Peace Momentum in J&K

read more
Af-Pak
May 2018 | Brief

Will Pakistan walk the Afghan Talk?

read more
Balochistan
May 2018 | Analysis

Who is targeting the Hazara? And Why?

read more
Radicalism Project
April 2018 | Analysis

“I am not Malala”: Deciphering the anti-Malala Sentiment in Pakistan

read more
Afghanistan I Sectarain
April 2018 | Analysis

The Sectarian Spiral in Afghanistan: Who? And Why?

read more
Sri Lanka
March 2018 | Analysis

The Anti-Muslim Violence in Sri Lanka

read more
Maldives
March 2018 | Analysis

The Political Crisis in Maldives

read more
Gender Violence
January 2018 | Analysis

South Asia's Kasur Problem: Hypocritical Civil Society, Insensitive Investigation, Indifferent Judiciary and a Hard State

read more
Regional
January 2018 | Analysis

South Asia's Conflict Peripheries

read more
Bilateral I Indo-Pak
January 2018 | Analysis

Will the Indo-Pak Relations improve in 2018?

read more
Myanmar
December 2017 | Analysis

South Asia's Rohingya Predicament

read more
Radicalism Project
November 2017 | Brief

The State surrenders to the Mullahs: Why did the Military aid? And why did the Government agree?

read more
Balochistan
November 2017 | Analysis

The Slow Burn: One Province and Five Actors

read more
Radicalism Project
November 2017 | Analysis

The Ghost of Mumtaz Qadri

read more
Peace Alert
November 2017 | Analysis

Towards an Inclusive Kashmir Dialogue

read more
Af-Pak
October 2017 | Analysis

Joshua and Caitlan: Story of Victims, Rescuers and Perpetrators

read more
Radicalism Project
October 2017 | Analysis

The Islamic State in South Asia: Why are the State and Society reluctant to acknowledge?

read more
Myanmar
September 2017 | Analysis

The Rohingya Politics: Between Strong Military, Weak Government, Rakhine Faultlines and Ma Ba Tha

read more
Myanmar
September 2017 | Analysis

The Rohingya Conflict: The Burning Villages, Social Media and the Internationalization of Violence

read more
Pakistan
August 2017 | Analysis

Jirga and Gender Violence

read more
Society
July 2017 | Analysis

Pashtunwali, Kashmiriyat and Sufi: Are our Social Codes under Stress?

read more
Sectarian
July 2017 | Analysis

Pakistan's Parachinar Problem

read more
Afghanistan
June 2017 | Analysis

Afghans’ Kabul Problem

read more
Pakistan
May 2017 | Comment

Fighting Taliban and the Islamic State: Don't prioritize

read more
India-Pakistan
April 2017 | Comment

Cross-LoC Interactions: Low Hanging Kashmir Fruit

read more
ISIS
April 2017 | Comment

Fighting the Daesh: A Regional Counter IS Strategy

read more
Pakistan
March 2017 | Brief

The Raddul Fasaad Fallouts: Will it succeed where Zarb-e-Azb failed?

read more
Pakistan
March 2017 | Comment

Deep-rooted Misogyny: Offend her; she will forgive in the name of tradition

read more
Pakistan
February 2017 | Comment

Court, Society and Valentine Day: Is expression of love against our culture?

read more
Pakistan
February 2017 | Brief

Hafiz Saeed Detention: Tactical Choice or Strategic Decision?

read more
Pakistan
January 2017 | Analysis

Terror revisits Parachinar: Kurram Agency’s Ten Year Sectarian Itch

read more
Pakistan
January 2017 | Analysis

State vs Militant Groups: What if the Genie has a mind of its own?

read more
Pakistan
January 2017 | Analysis

Sectarian Violence: No More Deja Vu

read more
Af-Pak
January 2017 | Comment

Pakistan’s Afghan Policy: What Shapes? Who Shapes? And through What Strategies?

read more
Pakistan
January 2017 | Analysis

Saudi Arabia, Iran and the ISIS: Pakistan’s Middle East Conundrum

read more
Pakistan
December 2016 | Analysis

Honour Killing: No Honour, Only Crime and Evil

read more
Pakistan
December 2016 | Analysis

Foreign Fighters: Why Pashtuns and Punjabis?

read more
Af-Pak
December 2016 | Analysis

Across the Durand Line: Who is in Control?

read more
Af-Pak
December 2016 | Analysis

Zarb-e-Azb: Pakistan, Afghanistan and the TTP

read more
Pakistan
December 2016 | Comment

And Now, They Are Coming For Our Children

read more
Af-Pak
December 2016 | Analysis

A Tale of Two Taliban: Linkages between Afghan and Pakistan Taliban

read more
Af-Pak
December 2016 | Analysis

Torkham Clashes: Pakistan, Afghanistan and the Durand Line

read more