The Hong Kong Protests

IPRI Briefs

Photo Source: BBC
   International Peace Research Initiative (IPRI)
Conflict Resolution and Peace Research Programme
National Institute of Advanced Studies (NIAS)
For any further information or to subscribe to Conflict Weekly alerts send an email to subachandran@nias.res.in

About the Author

N. Jayaram is an independent journalist currently based in Bangalore after having worked with the Press Trust of India news agency for 15 years, including as its Beijing correspondent (1988-94) and with Agence France-Presse news agency's Asia-Pacific operations in Hong Kong for 11 years until 2006, when he took time off to study human rights law (LLMHR) at the University of Hong Kong.  Since 2007 he has been editing and translating for NGOs and academic institutions, including the Hong Kong-based French Centre for Research on Contemporary China (CEFC).

 

Click here for PDF Version Print Bookmark

IPRI # 2, 10 October 2019

Contemporary Conflicts
The Hong Kong Protests

  N Jayaram

 

Click here for the PDF version.

 

In order to understand the current churning in Hong Kong, which has received global attention, it would be useful to take stock of developments in China and in Hong Kong from at least the mid-1970s.

 

Some essential details

Britain acquired Hong Kong island and the Kowloon peninsula after the mid-19th century Opium Wars, adding the vast New Territories taken on a 99-year lease from Qing Empire in 1898. In the 20th century, during the period of Civil War pitting the Communist Party (CPC) forces and the Nationalist (Kuomintang or KMT) forces and in the aftermath of the Communists’ victory and establishment of the People’s Republic of China 1949, there was a steady influx of refugees that helped boost Hong Kong’s economy. The influx continued during the periods when Mao imposed ultra-left policies such as the Great Leap Forward (1958-1961) and the Cultural Revolution (1966-1976). In 1967, at the height of the Cultural Revolution, there were also riots in Hong Kong, fuelled by the gross inequalities in the territory. This spurred the British colonial government to adopt a series of welfare measures including public housing, the addition of more schools and hospitals, crackdown on corruption and police reforms.

 

First Tiananmen Incident and later rise of Deng

Some weeks after Premier Zhou Enlai, long the number 2 leader after Mao Zedong, died in January 1976, there began an outpouring of grief as he was seen as having tried to temper the worst excesses of the regime. This was the first ‘Tiananmen Incident’ initially deemed ‘counter-revolutionary’. But after Mao’s own death in September that year, the downfall of the “Gang of Four” ultra-radical leaders, including Mao’s wife Jiang Qing, and the eventual rise of Deng Xiaoping as paramount leader by the late 1970s, the verdict on the Spring 1976 demonstrations was revised: it was deemed “patriotic”.

This revision of the labelling of the 1976 ‘Tiananmen Incident’ has continuing implications for subsequent and ongoing events in China and especially in Hong Kong.

Deng ushered in economic reforms and opening to the outside world calling for “Four Modernisations” – modernisation of agriculture, industry, science and technology and national defence. But he paid no heed to the call for a “Fifth Modernisation” demanded during the brief “Democracy Wall Movement” of late 1978 that was supportive of his policies. Rather, Wei Jingsheng, who articulated the democratisation demand, got jailed for his pains.

 

The Hong Kong question

Meanwhile time was ticking for Hong Kong’s New Territories lease. Banks and businesses had begun to worry: mortgage periods were being reduced – to 20 years, 15 years and so forth. When the issue was broached with Beijing, the reply was that Britain should hand over all of Hong Kong. Then began protracted negotiations resulting in the Sino-British Joint Declaration of 1984, which envisaged a “high degree of autonomy” for Hong Kong for 50 years, with international human rights treaties Britain was party to and which were automatically extended to Hong Kong continuing to apply beyond 1997. 

Deng had meanwhile come up with the “One Country, Two Systems” formula under which not only Hong Kong but the nearby Portuguese administered tiny enclave, Macau was to be handed over to China. More crucially, Taiwan, which Beijing deems a province of the PRC, was the formula’s most important target. Macau was handed over to Chinese sovereignty on 20 December 1999 and functions largely as a major gambling den for mainland Chinese tourists, with whatever little pro-democracy activism there is – among its current population of a mere 667,000 – easily muzzled, away from media glare. The issue of Taiwan will be discussed briefly infra. 
In order to frame the rules or the constitutional framework under which the post-handover Hong Kong was to function, a Basic Law Drafting Committee was set up in 1985, consisting mostly of officials from mainland China, assorted pro-Beijing figures in Hong Kong and a couple of pro-democracy ones.

 

Click here for the complete essay.

 

 

About the Author

N. Jayaram is an independent journalist currently based in Bangalore after having worked with the Press Trust of India news agency for 15 years, including as its Beijing correspondent (1988-94) and with Agence France-Presse news agency's Asia-Pacific operations in Hong Kong for 11 years until 2006, when he took time off to study human rights law (LLMHR) at the University of Hong Kong.  Since 2007 he has been editing and translating for NGOs and academic institutions, including the Hong Kong-based French Centre for Research on Contemporary China (CEFC).

 

Print Bookmark

Other IPRI Publications

Conflict Weekly 11
April 2020 | IPRI # 38
IPRI Comments

IPRI Team

Releasing a former soldier convicted of a war crime in Sri Lanka, Deepening of internal conflicts in Myanmar and the Taliban’s Deal is a smokescreen in Afghanistan

read more
Report Review
March 2020 | IPRI # 37
IPRI Comments

Lakshmi V Menon

Pakistan: Decline in Terrorism

read more
Conflict Weekly 10
March 2020 | IPRI # 36
IPRI Comments

IPRI Team

More violence in Afghanistan, Naxal ambush in India, Federal-Provincial differences in Pakistan's Corona fight, and a new report on the impact of CoronaVirus on Conflicts

read more
Conflict Weekly 09
March 2020 | IPRI # 35
IPRI Comments

IPRI Team

The CoronaVirus: South Asia copes, China stabilises, Europe bleeds and the US wakes up finally

read more
Conflict Weekly 08
March 2020 | IPRI # 34
IPRI Comments

IPRI Team

Triumphant Women's march across Pakistan, Anti-CAA Protests in Dhaka,  Two Presidents in Afghanistan, and Turkey-Russia Ceasefire in Syria

read more
Conflict Weekly 07
March 2020 | IPRI # 33
IPRI Comments

IPRI Team

Aurat March in Pakistan, US-Taliban Deal in Doha, Anti-CAA protest in Meghalaya, Sri Lanka’s withdrawal from the UNCHCR Resolution, and the problems of ceasefire in Syria and Libya 

read more
Conflict Weekly 06
February 2020 | IPRI # 32
IPRI Comments

IPRI Team

Seven Days of Peace in Afghanistan, Violence in Delhi, Setback to Peace Talks on Libya and the Ceasefire in Gaza

read more
Conflict Weekly 05
February 2020 | IPRI # 31
IPRI Comments

IPRI Team

Afghan Election Results, US-Taliban Deal, Hafiz Saeed Conviction, Quetta Suicide Attack, Assam Accord, Mexico Femicide and the Climate Change impact on Bird Species

read more
Conflict Weekly 04
February 2020 | IPRI # 30
IPRI Comments

IPRI Team

Sri Lanka drops Tamil anthem, Assam looks for a new census for the indigenous Muslim population, Bangladesh faces a Rohingya boat tragedy and Israel witnesses resurgence of violence post-Trump deal

read more
Conflict Weekly 03
February 2020 | IPRI # 29
IPRI Comments

IPRI Team

Continuing Violence in Afghanistan, Bodo Peace Accord in Northeast India, Attack on the anti-CAA protesters in Delhi, and Trump's Middle East Peace Plan

read more
Conflict Weekly 02
January 2020 | IPRI # 28
IPRI Comments

IPRI Team

Bangladesh and ICJ's Rohingya Verdict, Taliban and Afghan Peace, Surrenders in India's Northeast, New government in Lebanon and the Berlin summit on Libya

read more
Conflict Weekly 01
January 2020 | IPRI # 27
IPRI Comments

IPRI Team

Nile River Agreement, Tehran Protests, Syrians meet in Berlin, Honduran Caravans in Mexico, Taliban's ceasefire offer, Quetta Suicide attack, Supreme court verdict on J&K and the Brus Agreement in Tripura

read more
Myanmar
October 2019 | IPRI # 26
IPRI Comments

Aparupa Bhattacherjee

Will prosecuting Suu Kyi resolve the Rohingya problem?

read more
Climate Change
October 2019 | IPRI # 25
IPRI Comments

Lakshman Chakravarthy N & Rashmi Ramesh

Four Actors, No Action

read more
From Okjökull to OK:
September 2019 | IPRI # 24
IPRI Comments

Rashmi Ramesh

Death of a Glacier in Iceland

read more
The Hong Kong Protests:
August 2019 | IPRI # 23
IPRI Comments

Harini Madhusudan

Re-defining mass mobilization

read more
The Hong Kong Protest:
August 2019 | IPRI # 22
IPRI Comments

Parikshith Pradeep

Who Wants What?

read more
Myanmar
March 2019 | IPRI # 5
IPRI Comments

Aparupa Bhattacherjee

The Other Conflict in Rakhine State

read more
West Asia
February 2019 | IPRI # 4
IPRI Comments

Seetha Lakshmi Dinesh Iyer

Yemen: Will Sa'nna fall?

read more
China and Islam
February 2019 | IPRI # 3
IPRI Comments

Harini Madhusudhan

Sinicizing the Minorities

read more
Terrorism
January 2019 | IPRI # 2
IPRI Comments

Sourina Bej

Maghreb: What makes al Shahab Resilient?

read more
Global Politics
January 2019 | IPRI # 1
IPRI Comments

Aparupa Bhattacherjee

Myanmar: Will 2019 be better for the Rohingya?

read more